[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802113346.25714-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:33:46 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar, hdegoede@...hat.com,
kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0655/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/usb/tm6000/tm6000-video.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/tm6000/tm6000-video.c b/drivers/media/usb/tm6000/tm6000-video.c
index fa5e8bd..6a81a2e 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/tm6000/tm6000-video.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/tm6000/tm6000-video.c
@@ -1716,10 +1716,10 @@ int tm6000_v4l2_exit(void)
module_param(video_nr, int, 0);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(video_nr, "Allow changing video device number");
-module_param_named(debug, tm6000_debug, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(debug, tm6000_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "activates debug info");
-module_param(vid_limit, int, 0644);
+module_param(vid_limit, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vid_limit, "capture memory limit in megabytes");
module_param(keep_urb, bool, 0);
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists