[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802113026.23252-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:30:26 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, mkrufky@...uxtv.org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0618/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-audio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-audio.c b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-audio.c
index 49a5f95..45ee5cf 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-audio.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-audio.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
#include "em28xx.h"
static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "activates debug info");
#define EM28XX_MAX_AUDIO_BUFS 5
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists