[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802112217.17961-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:22:17 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tiwai@...e.de, Julia.Lawall@...6.fr, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com, niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se
Subject: [PATCH 0540/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c b/drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c
index dc81d42..3022e47 100644
--- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c
+++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-sf16fmr2.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#define FMR2_MAX 2
static int radio_nr[FMR2_MAX] = { [0 ... (FMR2_MAX - 1)] = -1 };
-module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(radio_nr, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(radio_nr, "Radio device numbers");
struct fmr2 {
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists