[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802111925.15959-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:19:25 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
maintainers@...echerrydvr.com, andrey.utkin@...p.bluecherry.net,
ismael@...ev.co.uk, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
nenggun.kim@...sung.com, hdegoede@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0510/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-core.c b/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-core.c
index 6d42dcf..6a0b98b 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-core.c
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
int budget_debug;
static int dma_buffer_size = TS_MIN_BUFSIZE_K;
-module_param_named(debug, budget_debug, int, 0644);
-module_param_named(bufsize, dma_buffer_size, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(debug, budget_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+module_param_named(bufsize, dma_buffer_size, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Turn on/off budget debugging (default:off).");
MODULE_PARM_DESC(bufsize, "DMA buffer size in KB, default: 188, min: 188, max: 1410 (Activy: 564)");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists