[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802111426.12757-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:14:26 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, awalls@...metrocast.net,
a.hajda@...sung.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dheitmueller@...nellabs.com, hans.verkuil@...co.com,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, olli.salonen@....fi
Subject: [PATCH 0463/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-i2c.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-i2c.c b/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-i2c.c
index ae061b3..cb0b7f9 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-i2c.c
@@ -26,11 +26,11 @@
#include <media/v4l2-common.h>
static unsigned int i2c_debug;
-module_param(i2c_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(i2c_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(i2c_debug, "enable debug messages [i2c]");
static unsigned int i2c_scan;
-module_param(i2c_scan, int, 0444);
+module_param(i2c_scan, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(i2c_scan, "scan i2c bus at insmod time");
#define dprintk(level, fmt, arg...)\
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists