[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb4e3c33-b2d3-00f3-3f2d-dcc4a641d53f@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:09:04 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mateusz Bajorski <mateusz.bajorski@...ia.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@...gle.com>,
Chih-Hung Hsieh <chh@...gle.com>,
Eric Caruso <ejcaruso@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression?] fib_rules: Added NLM_F_EXCL support to
fib_nl_newrule breaks Android userspace
On 8/2/16 11:03 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> So bisecting between v4.7 and linus/HEAD with the test above, it seems like:
> 96c63fa7393d ("net: Add l3mdev rule") is what breaks the tests.
>
> The l3mdev rule patch is a bit tangled with the fib_rules one, but if
> I revert both of those, the only thing that fails is the
> ./neighbour_test.py (which I need to dig further into). But those two
> changes seem to be connected to the regression I'm seeing with
> Android.
That is surprising since the l3mdev rule should not exist on Android
unless it has created a VRF.
Does Android have custom FRA types in <linux/fib_rules.h>? Perhaps there
is a collision on attribute number?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists