[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802110242.4858-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:02:42 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, hverkuil@...all.nl,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0347/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c
index b975da0..ae44abc 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/drxk_hard.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static bool is_qam(struct drxk_state *state)
#define DRXK_QAM_SL_SIG_POWER_QAM256 (43520)
static unsigned int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable debug messages");
#define dprintk(level, fmt, arg...) do { \
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists