linux-kernel - [PATCH 0400/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160802110806.8459-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date:	Tue,  2 Aug 2016 19:08:06 +0800
From:	Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To:	mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
	mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de, hal.rosenstock@...il.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc:	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
	baolex.ni@...el.com, standby24x7@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 0400/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
 drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-avc.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-avc.c b/drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-avc.c
index 251a556..e0fbc75 100644
--- a/drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-avc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/firewire/firedtv-avc.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static void pad_operands(struct avc_command_frame *c, int from)
 #define AVC_DEBUG_FCP_PAYLOADS                 0x8000
 
 static int avc_debug;
-module_param_named(debug, avc_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param_named(debug, avc_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Verbose logging (none = 0"
 	", FCP subactions"
 	": READ DESCRIPTOR = "		__stringify(AVC_DEBUG_READ_DESCRIPTOR)
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "Verbose logging (none = 0"
  */
 static unsigned int num_fake_ca_system_ids;
 static int fake_ca_system_ids[4] = { -1, -1, -1, -1 };
-module_param_array(fake_ca_system_ids, int, &num_fake_ca_system_ids, 0644);
+module_param_array(fake_ca_system_ids, int, &num_fake_ca_system_ids, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(fake_ca_system_ids, "If your CAM application manufacturer "
 		 "does not have the same ca_system_id as your CAS, you can "
 		 "override what ca_system_ids are presented to the "
-- 
2.9.2