[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802110640.7509-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:06:40 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, crope@....fi,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
standby24x7@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH 0386/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
index 25bdf6e..77f7c99 100644
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv090x.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
#define MAX_XFER_SIZE 64
static unsigned int verbose;
-module_param(verbose, int, 0644);
+module_param(verbose, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
/* internal params node */
struct stv090x_dev {
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists