[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <57A0636A0200007800101998@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 01:10:02 -0600
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Juergen Gross" <JGross@...e.com>
Cc: <david.vrabel@...rix.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen: Make VPMU init message look
less scary
>>> On 02.08.16 at 08:43, <JGross@...e.com> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/pmu.c
> @@ -547,8 +547,11 @@ void xen_pmu_init(int cpu)
> return;
>
> fail:
> - pr_info_once("Could not initialize VPMU for cpu %d, error %d\n",
> - cpu, err);
> + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + pr_info_once("VPMU disabled by hypervisor.\n");
> + else
> + pr_info_once("Could not initialize VPMU for cpu %d, error %d\n",
> + cpu, err);
I'm sorry for not already having thought about this for v1, but
what about older hypervisors, where the hypercall would return
-ENOSYS?
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists