[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802105418.31139-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:54:18 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com, dledford@...hat.com,
sean.hefty@...el.com, hal.rosenstock@...il.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, hch@...radead.org,
markb@...lanox.com, jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com,
dean.luick@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0261/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
index b48ad85..3ae01dc 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
MODULE_VERSION(DRIVER_VERSION);
static int deprecated_prof_sel = 2;
-module_param_named(prof_sel, deprecated_prof_sel, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(prof_sel, deprecated_prof_sel, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(prof_sel, "profile selector. Deprecated here. Moved to module mlx5_core");
static char mlx5_version[] =
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists