[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <111bfd53-d89d-d38f-32e5-5e83bad79dbc@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 11:09:23 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Shaun Tancheff <shaun@...cheff.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Fixup direct bi_rw modifiers
On 08/02/2016 05:32 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:55:36PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> Set of three patches, where the target one is an actual bug fix...
>> Temporary branch, I'll rebase it once -rc1 is out, if more
>> changes/fixups need to be made in the next week until that happens.
>>
>> http://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-4.8/bi_rwf
>
> Thanks. Any chance to have a slightly better name for the field?
> E.g. bi_opf or bi_op_flags if we want to be a bit more verbose.
bi_opf is fine with me as well, don't care too strongly about bi_rwf or
bi_opf. I don't like the longer variants.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists