[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802104942.27554-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:49:42 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: airlied@...ux.ie, kyungmin.park@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com, dougthompson@...ssion.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tomi.valkeinen@...com, airlied@...hat.com, peter.ujfalusi@...com,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0207/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
index 56c43f3..1678b7c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_of_match[];
#ifdef DSI_PERF_MEASURE
static bool dsi_perf;
-module_param(dsi_perf, bool, 0644);
+module_param(dsi_perf, bool, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
#endif
static inline struct dsi_data *dsi_get_dsidrv_data(struct platform_device *dsidev)
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists