[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87invjq97h.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:09:22 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>, jlayton@...chiereds.net,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, serge.hallyn@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] locks: Show only file_locks created in the same pidns as current process
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:00:39AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com> writes:
>>
>> > Currently when /proc/locks is read it will show all the file locks
>> > which are currently created on the machine. On containers, hosted
>> > on busy servers this means that doing lsof can be very slow. I
>> > observed up to 5 seconds stalls reading 50k locks, while the container
>> > itself had only a small number of relevant entries. Fix it by
>> > filtering the locks listed by the pidns of the current process
>> > and the process which created the lock.
>>
>> The locks always confuse me so I am not 100% connecting locks
>> to a pid namespace is appropriate.
>>
>> That said if you are going to filter by pid namespace please use the pid
>> namespace of proc, not the pid namespace of the process reading the
>> file.
>
> Oh, that makes sense, thanks.
>
> What does /proc/mounts use, out of curiosity? The mount namespace that
> /proc was originally mounted in?
/proc/mounts -> /proc/self/mounts
/proc/[pid]/mounts lists mounts from the mount namespace of the
appropriate process.
That is another way to go but it is a tread carefully thing as changing
things that way it is easy to surprise apparmor or selinux rules and be
surprised you broke someones userspace in a way that prevents booting.
Although I suspect /proc/locks isn't too bad.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists