linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch/x86: apply alternatives and paravirt patches after relocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1608021501470.22028@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2016 15:02:44 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
cc:	Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>,
	Eugene Shatokhin <eugene.shatokhin@...alab.ru>,
	live-patching@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] livepatch/x86: apply alternatives and paravirt
 patches after relocations

On Tue, 2 Aug 2016, Miroslav Benes wrote:

> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> > +#include <linux/livepatch.h>
> > +#include <asm/text-patching.h>
> 
> It seems I don't have such header file here and it causes a build error. 
> Shouldn't it be <asm/alternative.h>?

I've now refreshed our for-next branch so that it's based on v4.7 to allow 
for it being used as a up-to-date basis for development.

(there have been no KLP patches this merge window, which made for-next 
also quite silent).

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs