[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160802203035.GA8335@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 22:30:35 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uprobe: Add uprobe_pre/post_sstep_notifier to
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL
On 08/02, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
> uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier and uprobe_post_sstep_notifier are called from
> debug exception handler, so blacklist them for kprobing.
Let me add kprobes maintainers, I am a bit confused...
> @@ -1997,6 +1998,7 @@ int uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
> set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> return 1;
> }
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier);
>
> /*
> * uprobe_post_sstep_notifier gets called in interrupt context as part of notifier
> @@ -2014,6 +2016,7 @@ int uprobe_post_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
> set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
> return 1;
> }
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(uprobe_post_sstep_notifier);
but if we need to blacklist uprobe_pre/post_sstep_notifier then we
also need to blacklist their caller, arch_uprobe_exception_notify() ?
and every .notifier_call used in register_die_notifier() ?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists