linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 4.8 merge window

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFyPr=YJTd5XeURmpGxHPKxJDtpvHY_xLHEwU9a5i182iw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:46:29 -0400
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
	KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] KVM changes for 4.8 merge window

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I included my try to fixup the expected merge conflict between the
> KVM tree and the s390 tree at the end of the first please-merge email
> for s390.

Heh. It's "out of sight, out of mind". Once I've pulled something, I
usually don't have the mental bandwidth to remember details from
previous merge requests during the merge window. There's just too many
of them.

>   Dunno if you have noticed this, the merge result looks good
> to me.

Thanks,

                Linus