| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1470129255.30671.12.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:14:15 +0800
From: YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
To: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
CC: <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
"Bibby Hsieh" <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
<yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>,
shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/10] drm/mediatek: add dsi interrupt control
Hi CK,
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 14:07 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, YT:
>
> On Thu, 2016-07-28 at 17:28 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > From: shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>
> >
> > add dsi interrupt control
> >
> > Signed-off-by: shaoming chen <shaoming.chen@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > index a9cf5a1..553443a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> > #include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/component.h>
> > +#include <linux/irq.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> > @@ -29,6 +30,17 @@
> >
> > #define DSI_START 0x00
> >
> > +#define DSI_INTEN 0x08
> > +
> > +#define DSI_INTSTA 0x0c
> > +#define LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG BIT(0)
> > +#define CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG BIT(1)
> > +#define TE_RDY_INT_FLAG BIT(2)
> > +#define VM_DONE_INT_FLAG BIT(3)
> > +#define EXT_TE_RDY_INT_FLAG BIT(4)
> > +#define DSI_INT_ALL_BITS 0x7f
> > +#define DSI_BUSY BIT(31)
> > +
> > #define DSI_CON_CTRL 0x10
> > #define DSI_RESET BIT(0)
> > #define DSI_EN BIT(1)
> > @@ -71,6 +83,9 @@
> >
> > #define DSI_HSTX_CKL_WC 0x64
> >
> > +#define DSI_RACK 0x84
> > +#define RACK BIT(0)
> > +
> > #define DSI_PHY_LCCON 0x104
> > #define LC_HS_TX_EN BIT(0)
> > #define LC_ULPM_EN BIT(1)
> > @@ -131,8 +146,13 @@ struct mtk_dsi {
> > struct videomode vm;
> > int refcount;
> > bool enabled;
> > + int irq_data;
> > };
> >
> > +static wait_queue_head_t _dsi_cmd_done_wait_queue;
> > +static wait_queue_head_t _dsi_dcs_read_wait_queue;
> > +static wait_queue_head_t _dsi_wait_vm_done_queue;
>
> I think for difference irq status we can use only one wait queue. So
> multiple client wait on the same wait queue, but each client has
> different wake up condition.
Yes, we will implement only one wait queue to handle different irq
status here.
>
> > +
> > static inline struct mtk_dsi *encoder_to_dsi(struct drm_encoder *e)
> > {
> > return container_of(e, struct mtk_dsi, encoder);
> > @@ -437,6 +457,55 @@ static void mtk_dsi_start(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > writel(1, dsi->regs + DSI_START);
> > }
> >
> > +static void mtk_dsi_set_interrupt_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > +{
> > + u32 inten = DSI_INT_ALL_BITS;
> > +
> > + if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO)
> > + inten &= ~(TE_RDY_INT_FLAG | EXT_TE_RDY_INT_FLAG);
> > +
> > + writel(inten, dsi->regs + DSI_INTEN);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mtk_dsi_irq_wakeup(struct mtk_dsi *dsi, u32 irq_bit)
> > +{
> > + dsi->irq_data |= irq_bit;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t mtk_dsi_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = dev_id;
> > +
> > + u32 status, tmp;
> > +
> > + status = readl(dsi->regs + DSI_INTSTA);
> > +
> > + if (status & LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG) {
> > + do {
> > + mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_RACK, RACK, RACK);
> > + tmp = readl(dsi->regs + DSI_INTSTA);
> > + } while (tmp & DSI_BUSY);
> > +
> > + mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_INTSTA, LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG, 0);
> > + mtk_dsi_irq_wakeup(dsi, LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG);
> > + wake_up_interruptible(&_dsi_dcs_read_wait_queue);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (status & CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG) {
> > + mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_INTSTA, CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG, 0);
> > + mtk_dsi_irq_wakeup(dsi, CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG);
> > + wake_up_interruptible(&_dsi_cmd_done_wait_queue);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (status & VM_DONE_INT_FLAG) {
> > + mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_INTSTA, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 0);
> > + mtk_dsi_irq_wakeup(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG);
> > + wake_up_interruptible(&_dsi_wait_vm_done_queue);
> > + }
>
> I think these three part can be merged into one.
> u32 deal_status = LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG | CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG |
> VM_DONE_INT_FLAG;
> if (status & deal_status) {
> mtk_dsi_mask(dsi, DSI_INTSTA, deal_status, 0);
> mtk_dsi_irq_wakeup(dsi, status & deal_status);
> wake_up_interruptible(&_dsi_irq_wait_queue);
> }
>
> Otherwise, why enable DSI_INT_ALL_BITS, but deal only
> LPRX_RD_RDY_INT_FLAG, CMD_DONE_INT_FLAG, and VM_DONE_INT_FLAG?
OK, we will merge these parts into one and update the definition of
DSI_INT_ALL_BITS.
Regards,
yt.shen
>
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> > {
> > if (WARN_ON(dsi->refcount == 0))
> > @@ -485,6 +554,7 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> >
> > mtk_dsi_ps_control_vact(dsi);
> > mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(dsi);
> > + mtk_dsi_set_interrupt_enable(dsi);
> >
> > mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi);
> > mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1);
> > @@ -804,6 +874,7 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct device_node *remote_node, *endpoint;
> > struct resource *regs;
> > + int irq_num;
> > int comp_id;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -880,8 +951,29 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > + irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > + if (irq_num < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request dsi irq resource\n");
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + }
> > +
> > + irq_set_status_flags(irq_num, IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW);
> > + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_num, mtk_dsi_irq,
> > + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW, dev_name(&pdev->dev), dsi);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request mediatek dsi irq\n");
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dsi->irq_data = 0;
> > + dev_info(dev, "dsi irq num is 0x%x\n", irq_num);
> > +
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dsi);
> >
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&_dsi_cmd_done_wait_queue);
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&_dsi_dcs_read_wait_queue);
> > + init_waitqueue_head(&_dsi_wait_vm_done_queue);
> > +
> > return component_add(&pdev->dev, &mtk_dsi_component_ops);
> > }
> >
>
> Regards,
> CK
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists