[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802103859.18949-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:38:59 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: ed.cashin@....org, len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0078/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c b/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c
index ec9d861..2d82199 100644
--- a/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/aoe/aoeblk.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static struct dentry *aoe_debugfs_dir;
/* GPFS needs a larger value than the default. */
static int aoe_maxsectors;
-module_param(aoe_maxsectors, int, 0644);
+module_param(aoe_maxsectors, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(aoe_maxsectors,
"When nonzero, set the maximum number of sectors per I/O request");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists