[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802105212.29546-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:52:12 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: fenghua.yu@...el.com, jdelvare@...e.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
airlied@...ux.ie, kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
dougthompson@...ssion.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
aduggan@...aptics.com, dianders@...omium.org
Subject: [PATCH 0237/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index 6a27eb2..83ba05c 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
* When set, it replaces the driver's suboptimal heuristic.
*/
static int force_tjmax;
-module_param_named(tjmax, force_tjmax, int, 0444);
+module_param_named(tjmax, force_tjmax, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(tjmax, "TjMax value in degrees Celsius");
#define BASE_SYSFS_ATTR_NO 2 /* Sysfs Base attr no for coretemp */
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists