[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5391e340-1285-574d-1979-a19571341eb5@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:30:48 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
tj@...nel.org, lenb@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, travis@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0063/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Hello.
On 8/2/2016 1:37 PM, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c b/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
> index bce2a8c..1dc0beb 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_legacy.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
> #define NR_HOST 6
>
> static int all;
> -module_param(all, int, 0444);
> +module_param(all, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
There's S_IRUGO for this case, no?
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists