[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802111432.12826-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:14:32 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, awalls@...metrocast.net,
a.hajda@...sung.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hans.verkuil@...co.com, sw0312.kim@...sung.com,
jh1009.sung@...sung.com, nenggun.kim@...sung.com,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0464/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-vbi.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-vbi.c b/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-vbi.c
index 39750eb..2822ddc 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-vbi.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/cx23885/cx23885-vbi.c
@@ -23,11 +23,11 @@
#include "cx23885.h"
static unsigned int vbibufs = 4;
-module_param(vbibufs, int, 0644);
+module_param(vbibufs, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vbibufs, "number of vbi buffers, range 2-32");
static unsigned int vbi_debug;
-module_param(vbi_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(vbi_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(vbi_debug, "enable debug messages [vbi]");
#define dprintk(level, fmt, arg...)\
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists