[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802112420.19250-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:24:20 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com, mkrufky@...uxtv.org,
s.nawrocki@...sung.com, kgene@...nel.org, k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com, max@...mpel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0559/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c b/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c
index 6ab35e3..18670c2 100644
--- a/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c
+++ b/drivers/media/tuners/r820t.c
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@
#define VER_NUM 49
static int debug;
-module_param(debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug, "enable verbose debug messages");
static int no_imr_cal;
-module_param(no_imr_cal, int, 0444);
+module_param(no_imr_cal, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(no_imr_cal, "Disable IMR calibration at module init");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists