[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802111918.15891-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:19:18 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: mchehab@...nel.org, maurochehab@...il.com, mchehab@...radead.org,
mchehab@...hat.com, m.chehab@...sung.com,
maintainers@...echerrydvr.com, andrey.utkin@...p.bluecherry.net,
ismael@...ev.co.uk, bp@...en8.de
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
nenggun.kim@...sung.com, hdegoede@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0509/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-ci.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-ci.c b/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-ci.c
index 7b27af4..a3507e5 100644
--- a/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-ci.c
+++ b/drivers/media/pci/ttpci/budget-ci.c
@@ -86,11 +86,11 @@
#define IR_DEVICE_ANY 255
static int rc5_device = -1;
-module_param(rc5_device, int, 0644);
+module_param(rc5_device, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(rc5_device, "only IR commands to given RC5 device (device = 0 - 31, any device = 255, default: autodetect)");
static int ir_debug;
-module_param(ir_debug, int, 0644);
+module_param(ir_debug, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(ir_debug, "enable debugging information for IR decoding");
DVB_DEFINE_MOD_OPT_ADAPTER_NR(adapter_nr);
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists