linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0228/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160802122308.GC23544@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:23:08 +0200
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
Cc:	erazor_de@...rs.sourceforge.net, jikos@...nel.org,
	benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, airlied@...ux.ie, kgene@...nel.org,
	k.kozlowski@...sung.com, dougthompson@...ssion.com, bp@...en8.de,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chuansheng.liu@...el.com, alexander.deucher@....com,
	ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0228/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:51:26PM +0800, Baole Ni wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-roccat-koneplus.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-koneplus.c b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-koneplus.c
> index 09e8fc7..4ce8c6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-koneplus.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-roccat-koneplus.c
> @@ -291,10 +291,10 @@ static ssize_t koneplus_sysfs_set_actual_profile(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	return size;
>  }
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(actual_profile, 0660,
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(actual_profile, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP,
>  		   koneplus_sysfs_show_actual_profile,
>  		   koneplus_sysfs_set_actual_profile);
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(startup_profile, 0660,
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(startup_profile, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP,
>  		   koneplus_sysfs_show_actual_profile,
>  		   koneplus_sysfs_set_actual_profile);
>  
> @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static ssize_t koneplus_sysfs_show_firmware_version(struct device *dev,
>  
>  	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", info.firmware_version);
>  }
> -static DEVICE_ATTR(firmware_version, 0440,
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(firmware_version, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP,
>  		   koneplus_sysfs_show_firmware_version, NULL);

DEVICE_ATTR_RO or DEVICE_ATTR_RW as needed please.