[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802122213.27742-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:22:13 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: clemens@...isch.de, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
serge@...lyn.com, davem@...emloft.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH 1164/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
sound/drivers/opl4/opl4_seq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/drivers/opl4/opl4_seq.c b/sound/drivers/opl4/opl4_seq.c
index 03d6202..6e977cd 100644
--- a/sound/drivers/opl4/opl4_seq.c
+++ b/sound/drivers/opl4/opl4_seq.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
int volume_boost = 8;
-module_param(volume_boost, int, 0644);
+module_param(volume_boost, int, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(volume_boost, "Additional volume for OPL4 wavetable sounds.");
static int snd_opl4_seq_use_inc(struct snd_opl4 *opl4)
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists