[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802104003.19957-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:40:03 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: josh.h.morris@...ibm.com, pjk1939@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, pavel@....cz,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...com,
shraddha.6596@...il.com, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
baolex.ni@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 0093/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
drivers/block/sx8.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/sx8.c b/drivers/block/sx8.c
index ba4bfe9..e2b6c08 100644
--- a/drivers/block/sx8.c
+++ b/drivers/block/sx8.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ MODULE_VERSION(DRV_VERSION);
* but problems seem to occur when you exceed ~30, even on newer hardware.
*/
static int max_queue = 1;
-module_param(max_queue, int, 0444);
+module_param(max_queue, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_queue, "Maximum number of queued commands. (min==1, max==30, safe==1)");
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists