[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802122753.31480-1-baolex.ni@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:27:53 +0800
From: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
To: perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, serge@...lyn.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
k.kozlowski@...sung.com
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com, baolex.ni@...el.com,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: [PATCH 1219/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
---
sound/pci/cs5530.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/pci/cs5530.c b/sound/pci/cs5530.c
index 0a8cf94..760798e 100644
--- a/sound/pci/cs5530.c
+++ b/sound/pci/cs5530.c
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ static int index[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_IDX;
static char *id[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_STR;
static bool enable[SNDRV_CARDS] = SNDRV_DEFAULT_ENABLE_PNP;
-module_param_array(index, int, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(index, int, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(index, "Index value for CS5530 Audio driver.");
-module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(id, charp, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(id, "ID string for CS5530 Audio driver.");
-module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, 0444);
+module_param_array(enable, bool, NULL, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(enable, "Enable CS5530 Audio driver.");
struct snd_cs5530 {
--
2.9.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists