[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160802141503.1e8d8796@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 14:15:03 +0100
From: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0001/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with
macro
On Tue, 2 Aug 2016 18:33:22 +0800
Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com> wrote:
> I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
> when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
> As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
> and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
> thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
If you are going to do this then please generate one patch per subsystem,
and just do a couple of subsystems initially until everyone is happy with
how it is being converted, then send out more subsystem by subsystem.
Alan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists