[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87popqpto8.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:44:55 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
To: ZhengYuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@...inos.cn>
Cc: shli@...nel.org, liuzhengyuang521@...il.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ZhengYuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@...inos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] raid5: fix incorrectly counter of conf->empty_inactive_list_nr
On Thu, Jul 28 2016, ZhengYuan Liu wrote:
> The counter conf->empty_inactive_list_nr is only used for determine if the
> raid5 is congested which is deal with in function raid5_congested().
> It was increased in get_free_stripe() when conf->inactive_list got to be
> empty and decreased in release_inactive_stripe_list() when splice
> temp_inactive_list to conf->inactive_list. However, this may have a
> problem when raid5_get_active_stripe or stripe_add_to_batch_list was called,
> because these two functions may call list_del_init(&sh->lru) to delete sh from
> "conf->inactive_list + hash" which may cause "conf->inactive_list + hash" to
> be empty when atomic_inc_not_zero(&sh->count) got false. So a check should be
> done at these two point and increase empty_inactive_list_nr accordingly.
> Otherwise the counter may get to be negative number which would influence
> async readahead from VFS.
>
> Signed-off-by: ZhengYuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@...inos.cn>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index 7c53861..1656c44 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ raid5_get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
> {
> struct stripe_head *sh;
> int hash = stripe_hash_locks_hash(sector);
> + int inc_empty_inactive_list_flag;
>
> pr_debug("get_stripe, sector %llu\n", (unsigned long long)sector);
>
> @@ -703,7 +704,12 @@ raid5_get_active_stripe(struct r5conf *conf, sector_t sector,
> atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> BUG_ON(list_empty(&sh->lru) &&
> !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &sh->state));
> + inc_empty_inactive_list_flag = 0;
> + if (!list_empty(conf->inactive_list + hash))
> + inc_empty_inactive_list_flag = 1;
> list_del_init(&sh->lru);
> + if (list_empty(conf->inactive_list + hash) && inc_empty_inactive_list_flag)
> + atomic_inc(&conf->empty_inactive_list_nr);
Maybe I'm forgetting an important detail, but this seems more
complicated than it needs to be.
The code just just confirmed that sh->count is zero, so sh must be on
the inactive list, mustn't it?
So inc_empty_inactive_list_flag can never be set to 1.
What am I missing? Could sh not be on the inactive list at this point?
Same for the code below.
NeilBrown
> if (sh->group) {
> sh->group->stripes_cnt--;
> sh->group = NULL;
> @@ -762,6 +768,7 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh
> sector_t head_sector, tmp_sec;
> int hash;
> int dd_idx;
> + int inc_empty_inactive_list_flag;
>
> if (!stripe_can_batch(sh))
> return;
> @@ -781,7 +788,11 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(struct r5conf *conf, struct stripe_head *sh
> atomic_inc(&conf->active_stripes);
> BUG_ON(list_empty(&head->lru) &&
> !test_bit(STRIPE_EXPANDING, &head->state));
> + if (!list_empty(conf->inactive_list + hash))
> + inc_empty_inactive_list_flag = 1;
> list_del_init(&head->lru);
> + if (list_empty(conf->inactive_list + hash) && inc_empty_inactive_list_flag)
> + atomic_inc(&conf->empty_inactive_list_nr);
> if (head->group) {
> head->group->stripes_cnt--;
> head->group = NULL;
> --
> 1.9.1
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (819 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists