[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1470215880.4612.3.camel@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 11:18:00 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Bin Gao <bin.gao@...el.com>,
Chandra Sekhar Anagani <chandra.sekhar.anagani@...el.com>,
Pranav Tipnis <pranav.tipnis@...el.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] usb: typec: USB Type-C Port Manager (tcpm)
On Tue, 2016-08-02 at 13:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> +static int tcpm_set_polarity(struct tcpm_port *port,
> + enum typec_cc_polarity polarity)
> +{
> + tcpm_log(port, "polarity %d", polarity);
> +
> + port->polarity = polarity;
> +
> + return port->tcpc->set_polarity(port->tcpc, port->polarity);
> +}
Here you don't care about the result.
> +
> +static int tcpm_set_vconn(struct tcpm_port *port, bool enable)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + tcpm_log(port, "vconn:=%d", enable);
> +
> + ret = port->tcpc->set_vconn(port->tcpc, enable);
> + if (!ret) {
> + port->con.vconn_role = enable ? TYPEC_SOURCE
> + : TYPEC_SINK;
> + typec_set_vconn_role(port->typec_port,
> port->con.vconn_role);
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
But here you do. Which is right?
Regards
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists