[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2fde63f3-62b1-75a0-524a-f858ff1de459@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 12:55:33 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] ARM: omap: fix 4.7 gpmc networking regression
On 03/08/16 11:01, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:46:24AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> On 02/08/16 13:35, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> [160724 05:11]:
>>>> Networking is currently broken for Overo boards due to a regression in
>>>> 4.7. I bisected it down to
>>>>
>>>> d2d00862dfbb ("memory: omap-gpmc: Support general purpose input
>>>> for WAITPINs")
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Note that simply fixing the Overo NAND issue would fix the Overo
>>>> networking regression, but by restoring the 4.6 gpmc-probe behaviour
>>>> similar regressions on other OMAP systems are also avoided.
>>>
>>> Roger, got a better fix in mind?
>>>
>>
>> Nope. I'll take patch 1 in my omap-gpmc queue for v4.8.
>> Thanks for the fixes Johan.
>
> Now that 4.7 has been released, you may want to consider adding a stable
> tag also for the first patch to avoid similar issues on other systems
> when they get updated to 4.7-stable.
>
Yes, that was my plan as well.
cheers,
-roger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists