linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] tracefs: add instances support for uprobe events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <57A25104.7040805@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 01:46:04 +0530
From:	Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, daniel@...earbox.net,
	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	kernel@...p.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, ananth@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] tracefs: add instances support for uprobe
 events



On Thursday 04 August 2016 01:40 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 01:00:51 +0530
> Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>>
>>> Can a container have its own function tracing?  
>>
>> Sorry, I didn't understand that. Do you mean to have a separate
>> per-container trace files?
> 
> Actually, it's more my ignorance of containers, as I haven't had the
> need to play with them. Although, I think it may be time to do so.
> 
> When a container enters kernel mode, I'm assuming that it's part of the
> host at that moment, and the host needs to take care of separating
> everything? That is, there's not a "second kernel" like VMs have, right?

Yes. The host needs to take care of separating everything. There is no
"second kernel".

> 
> -- Steve
> 

-- 
Regards,
Aravinda