lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:25:13 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Subject: Re: Generic section maintainers On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 10:11:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:56:22 PM CEST Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Arnd, Josh, > > > > In my linker table work [0], other than the linker table work and > > section ranges stuff, I'm adding: > > > > o include/linux/sections.h > > o include/asm-generic/section-core.h (not in RFC v3 but it is in my > > RFC v4 series not yet posted, splitting this up fixes compilation on > > powerpc which otherwise creates a header issue nightmare to resolve) > > > > I extend include/asm-generic/sections.h to then include > > <asm-generic/section-core.h>, and furthermore provide the beginning of > > a central place to document in a central place all common sections. > > > > As per checkpatch complaints I'll be adding myself to MAINTAINERS for > > the linker table headers, section ranges, but noticed then we don't > > have anyone in particularly looking carefully after > > include/asm-generic/sections.h other than the default which is Arnd. > > Given this work on streamlining the section stuff, I'd like to help so > > am considering adding a specific entry on MAINTAINRERS for generic > > sections and adding myself to it along with Arnd. Wanted to check if > > this is OK. While at it, it occurred to me that you might be > > interested in this a swell Josh, given your work with objtool. Would > > anyone else like to help with active maintenance / review of these ? > > I'd rather not be listed separately for this file, I'm not really > an expert on linker scripts, and checkpatch.pl will pick up my > address anyway. I'm definitely not an expert on linker scripts, nor do I think many folk are, I just need to get work done and by chance have gotten involved into dark creepy corners. > With my name removed from the entry, please add > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> OK I'll fold the changes into the patch provided Josh is also OK with it, but will keep the ACK out given that the patch has other changes, I'd hope for a review upon the next respin. > If you want, I can still merge the patches for these files through > my asm-generic git tree, but then I'd rely on you to pick them > up and forward them after review. Sure. Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists