linux-kernel - Fwd: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Present useful limits to user (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 06:59:54 +0000
From:	Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@...il.com>
To:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Fwd: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Present useful limits to user (v2)

Resending to lkml without cc's.

Hello,

I'm trying the systemtap approach and it looks promising. The script is
annotating strace-like output with capability, device access and RLIMIT
information. In the end there's a summary. Here's sample output from
wpa_supplicant run:

mprotect(0x7efebf140000, 16384, PROT_READ) = 0 [DATA 548864 -> 573440]
[AS 44986368 -> 45002752]
brk(0x55d9611f8000) = 94392125718528 missing
[Capabilities=CAP_SYS_ADMIN] [AS 45002752 -> 45010944]
open(0x55d960716462, O_RDWR) = 3 [DeviceAllow=/dev/char/1:3 rw ]
open("/dev/random", O_RDONLY|O_NONBLOCK) = 3 [DeviceAllow=/dev/char/1:8 r ]
socket(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 4
[RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_UNIX] [NOFILE 3 -> 4]
open("/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf", O_RDONLY) = 5 [NOFILE 4 -> 5]
socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW, 0) = 5 [RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_NETLINK]
socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 16) = 6
[RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_NETLINK] [NOFILE 5 -> 6]
socket(PF_NETLINK, SOCK_RAW|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 16) = 7
[RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_NETLINK] [NOFILE 6 -> 7]
socket(PF_INET, SOCK_DGRAM, IPPROTO_IP) = 8
[RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_INET] [NOFILE 7 -> 8]
open("/dev/rfkill", O_RDONLY) = 9 [DeviceAllow=/dev/char/10:58 r ]
[NOFILE 8 -> 9]
socket(PF_LOCAL, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, 0) = 10
[RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_UNIX] [NOFILE 9 -> 10]
sendmsg(6, 0x7ffc778f35b0, 0x0) = 36 [Capabilities=CAP_NET_ADMIN]

Summary:
CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_NET_ADMIN CAP_NET_RAW
Consider also missing CapabilityBoundingSet=CAP_SYS_ADMIN
DeviceAllow=/dev/char/1:3 rw
DeviceAllow=/dev/char/1:8 r
DeviceAllow=/dev/char/10:58 r
DeviceAllow=/dev/char/1:9 r
LimitFSIZE=0
LimitDATA=577536
LimitSTACK=139264
LimitCORE=0
LimitNOFILE=15
LimitAS=45146112
LimitNPROC=171
LimitMEMLOCK=0
LimitSIGPENDING=0
LimitMSGQUEUE=0
LimitNICE=0
LimitRTPRIO=0
RestrictAddressFamilies=AF_UNIX AF_INET AF_NETLINK AF_PACKET
MemoryDenyWriteExecute=true

Some values are not correct. NPROC is wrong because staprun needs to be
run as root instead of the separate privileged user for wpa_supplicant
and that messes user process count. DATA/AS/STACK seems to be a bit off.
I can easily use this as systemd service configuration drop-in otherwise.

Now, the relevant part for the kernel is that I'd like to analyze error
paths better, so the system calls would be also annotated when there's a
failure when a RLIMIT is too tight. It would be easier to insert probes
if there was only one path for RLIMIT checks. Would it be OK to make the
function task_rlimit() a full check against the limit and also make it a
non-inlined function, just for improved probing purposes?

There's already error analysis for the capabilities, but there are some
false positive hits (like brk() complaining about missing CAP_SYS_ADMIN
above).

-Topi

View attachment "strace.stp" of type "text/plain" (19080 bytes)