linux-kernel - [PATCH 7/9] remoteproc: core: Add function to over-ride current resource table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160804092153.23032-8-lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu,  4 Aug 2016 10:21:51 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kernel@...inux.com, patrice.chotard@...com, ohad@...ery.com,
	bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
	loic.pallardy@...com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] remoteproc: core: Add function to over-ride current resource table

Most of the new resource table handling function are now in place, so
it's time to put it all together.  Once new resource table information
has been requested, the structures will be held in a holding pen until
boot-time.  During boot-time rproc_apply_resource_overrides() will be
invoked which in turn will pull the new information out of the holding
pen and edit the table accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 111350e..6b4e29a 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1035,6 +1035,65 @@ rproc_add_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
 	return table;
 }
 
+static struct resource_table*
+rproc_apply_resource_overrides(struct rproc *rproc,
+			       struct resource_table **orig_table,
+			       int *tablesz)
+{
+	struct rproc_request_resource *resource;
+	struct resource_table *table = *orig_table;
+	int size = *tablesz;
+
+	if (!table && size != 0) {
+		dev_err(&rproc->dev, "No table present but table size is set\n");
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
+	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
+
+	rproc_dump_resource_table(rproc, table, size);
+
+	if (!table) {
+		size = sizeof(*table);
+		table = devm_kzalloc(&rproc->dev, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!table) {
+			table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+			goto out;
+		}
+		table->ver = 1;
+	}
+
+	list_for_each_entry(resource, &rproc->override_resources, node) {
+		int updated = 0;
+
+		/* If we already have a table, update it with the new values. */
+		updated = rproc_update_resource_table_entry(rproc, resource,
+							    table, size);
+		if (updated < 0) {
+			table = ERR_PTR(updated);
+			goto out;
+		}
+		if (updated)
+			continue;
+
+		/* Didn't find matching resource entry -- creating a new one. */
+		table = rproc_add_resource_table_entry(rproc, resource,
+						       table, &size);
+		if (IS_ERR(table))
+			goto out;
+
+		*orig_table = table;
+	}
+
+	rproc_dump_resource_table(rproc, table, size);
+
+	*tablesz = size;
+
+ out:
+	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	return table;
+}
+
 /*
  * take a firmware and boot a remote processor with it.
  */
@@ -1153,6 +1212,12 @@ static void rproc_fw_config_virtio(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
 	if (!table)
 		goto out;
 
+	if (!list_empty(&rproc->override_resources)) {
+		table = rproc_apply_resource_overrides(rproc, &table, &tablesz);
+		if (IS_ERR(table))
+			goto out;
+	}
+
 	rproc->table_csum = crc32(0, table, tablesz);
 
 	/*
-- 
2.9.0