[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160804121303.62766-2-yuchao0@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:13:03 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: avoid potential deadlock in f2fs_move_file_range
Thread A Thread B
- inode_lock fileA
- inode_lock fileB
- inode_lock fileA
- inode_lock fileB
We may encounter above potential deadlock during moving file range in
concurrent scenario. This patch fixes the issue by using inode_trylock
instead.
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
---
fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index 409f0ec..ebf2703 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -2169,8 +2169,12 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
inode_lock(src);
- if (src != dst)
- inode_lock(dst);
+ if (src != dst) {
+ if (!inode_trylock(dst)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ }
ret = -EINVAL;
if (pos_in + len > src->i_size || pos_in + len < pos_in)
@@ -2228,6 +2232,7 @@ static int f2fs_move_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
out_unlock:
if (src != dst)
inode_unlock(dst);
+out:
inode_unlock(src);
return ret;
}
--
2.8.2.311.gee88674
Powered by blists - more mailing lists