linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/9] remoteproc: core: New API to add new resources to the resource table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 15:00:58 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kernel@...inux.com, patrice.chotard@...com, ohad@...ery.com,
	bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
	loic.pallardy@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] remoteproc: core: New API to add new resources to
 the resource table

On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Lee Jones wrote:

> In order to amend or add a new resource table entry we need a method
> for a platform-specific to submit them. rproc_request_resource() is a
> new public API which provides this functionality.
> 
> It is to be called between rproc_alloc() and rproc_add().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  21 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 4914482..0abfa2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -793,6 +793,130 @@ static void rproc_resource_cleanup(struct rproc *rproc)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void rproc_dump_resource_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				      struct resource_table *table, int size)
> +{

Ah!  Looks like I mistakenly squashed two patches together.  I won't
re-send, but please treat these two functions as separate patches.  I
will fix this during v2, once I've received some feedback.

[...]

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog