[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160804140526.GA23195@linux-mips.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:05:26 +0200
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
James Hartley <james.hartley@...tec.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@...tec.com>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: dont specify STACKPROTECTOR in defconfigs
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 03:03:59PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Only one defconfig has a STACKPROTECTOR value. And it asks for
> the strong variant, which isn't supported by older toolchains.
>
> Due to the nature of MIPS having more platform specific code than say
> x86, the allyesconfig and allmodconfig aren't as effective for build
> coverage. So, in addition, I like to use a trivial script to walk all
> the defconfigs and build each one.
>
> However I will get false positives on unsupported stackprotector values
> with an older toolchain like gcc-4.6.3. As in this instance I am just
> using the compiler as a glorified syntax checker on a machine where I
> build a bunch of other arch for the same reason, there is no real
> motivation to get a newer toolchain for improved optimization etc.
>
> Since there is only one of them, and there is nothing about these
> settings that are board/platform specific, I propose we just eliminate
> the existing instance and take the default.
Yeah, I can see how that one may get annoying. I wish there was something
along the lines of KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG that was working not only for
allyesconfig/allmodconfig/allnoconfig/randconfig.
Applied. Thanks,
Ralf
Powered by blists - more mailing lists