[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160804100846.5f36a00a@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:08:46 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, daniel@...earbox.net,
peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
kernel@...p.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, ananth@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] tracefs: add instances support for uprobe
events
On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 19:16:03 +0530
Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Separation is based on the context in which the function is called.
> Hence, containers can see only those kernel functions that are
> triggered/invoked by the processes running inside that container and
> should not see other kernel functions, for example, called by RCU grace
> period kthread or any other kthread.
>
What about interrupts and softirqs? They run under the container
process's context, but service other processes outside the container.
Same goes for trace events.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists