linux-kernel - Re: next build: 143 builds: 1 failed, 142 passed, 1 error, 22 warnings (next-20160801)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160804144901.12765.qmail@ns.sciencehorizons.net>
Date:	4 Aug 2016 10:49:01 -0400
From:	"George Spelvin" <linux@...encehorizons.net>
To:	geert@...ux-m68k.org, linux@...encehorizons.net
Cc:	arnd@...db.de, bot@...nelci.org,
	kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: next build: 143 builds: 1 failed, 142 passed, 1 error, 22 warnings (next-20160801)

> As these patches were meant for generic non-m68k code, I didn't plan
> to take them through my tree.

Well, that explains everything.  Sorry for letting it fall through the
cracks.  I assumed that since you send pull requests to Linus regularly,
you'd send it directly.

That's why I only acked the patch rather than did anything with it.

So, who wants to send it now?