linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANq1E4QKdZtJ+g9adzQhgd1b0TYsz_yVJpFbx_t90HJbtyuM9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:44:23 +0200
From:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To:	Luc Verhaegen <libv@...net.be>
Cc:	Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] drm: add SimpleDRM driver

Hi

On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Luc Verhaegen <libv@...net.be> wrote:
> Do we really want to recreate a 400+ email thread again, or are we
> capable of learning from the past?

No we don't. And no-one intends to. I am fully aware of the discussion
that introduced the clock-dependencies to simplefb, and I gladly
accept patches that add such support to SimpleDRM. Did anyone say
otherwise? This series adds initial support for the devices _we_ know
and can test (which is x86 and RPi, in my case). If someone wants
support for more devices, please send patches. Why does this have to
be included (or even discussed) as part of this submission?

Thanks
David