[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALcN6mhjsUtV4A7f2o1rKLobtfjxDWxyfL-LW_yNRj2ZpaYYag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:23:43 -0700
From: David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf/core: introduce pmu_event_flags and PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG
>> Introduce the flag PMUEF_READ_CPU_PKG, useful for uncore events, that
>> allows a PMU to signal the generic perf code that an event is readable
>> on the current CPU if the event is:
>> - active in a CPU in the same package as the current CPU (local CPU)
>
> Ok that I get..
>
>> - not active but is attached to a CPU (i.e. event->cpu != -1) in the
>> same package as the current CPU.
>
> but this, not so much. Why would you want to read an inactive counter?
Uncore counters are active even if its event is not.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists