[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87twf1ck95.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 21:59:02 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: daniel@...earbox.net, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
paulus@...ba.org, kernel@...p.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
ananth@...ibm.com,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] perf/tracefs: Container-aware tracing support
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> This RFC patch set supports filtering container specific events
> when perf tool is executed inside a container. The patches apply
> cleanly on v4.7.0-rc7
>
> Changes from v1:
> 1/3. Revived earlier approach[1] with cgroup namespace instead
> of pid namespace
> 2/3. New patch that adds instance support for uprobe events in
> tracefs filesystem
> 3/3. New patch that adds "newinstance" mount option for tracefs
> filesystem
"newinstace" ick no.
I see no justification anywhere why the perf cgroup is not enough for
this.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists