[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160805005826.GD15690@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:58:26 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: qcom_smd: Fix voltage ranges for pm8x41
On 07/11, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 02:50:07PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > static const struct regulator_desc pm8941_pldo = {
> > .linear_ranges = (struct regulator_linear_range[]) {
> > - REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE( 750000, 0, 30, 25000),
> > - REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1500000, 31, 99, 50000),
> > + REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE( 750000, 0, 63, 12500),
> > + REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1550000, 64, 126, 25000),
> > + REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(3100000, 127, 163, 50000),
> > },
> > - .n_linear_ranges = 2,
> > - .n_voltages = 100,
> > + .n_linear_ranges = 3,
> > + .n_voltages = 164,
> > .ops = &rpm_smps_ldo_ops,
> > };
>
> Still a little confused on if the 12.5mV is allowed on pmos ldo. It seems like the
> nmos has 1 range of 5mV steps. The PMOS has 2 ranges, using 25mV and 50mV
>
The values I've put in these patches are the correct ranges.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists