[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160805142521.GA21312@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 16:25:21 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] tracing: Added hardware latency tracer
* Steven Rostedt | 2016-08-04 10:57:09 [-0400]:
>diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
>new file mode 100644
>index 000000000000..08dfabe4e862
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
…
>+/* Macros to encapsulate the time capturing infrastructure */
>+#define time_type u64
>+#define time_get() trace_clock_local()
>+#define time_to_us(x) div_u64(x, 1000)
>+#define time_sub(a, b) ((a) - (b))
>+#define init_time(a, b) (a = b)
>+#define time_u64(a) a
Do we need a macro for this? In the old code we could choose between
CONFIG_TRACING but now we don't.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists