linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/power/64: Do not refer to __PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1601227.1rWnhT6gJp@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:44:07 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/power/64: Do not refer to __PAGE_OFFSET from assembly code

On Friday, August 05, 2016 12:37:13 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2016-08-03 01:19:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > 
> > When CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY is set on x86-64, __PAGE_OFFSET becomes
> > a variable and using it as a symbol in the image memory restoration
> > assembly code under core_restore_code is not correct any more.
> 
> On a related note... we should really have page_offset variable in
> such case, and use that -- having __FOO_BAR not being a constant is
> ugly/confusing/dangerous.
> 
> > To avoid that problem, modify set_up_temporary_mappings() to compute
> > the physical address of the temporary page tables and store it in
> > temp_level4_pgt, so that the value of that variable is ready to be
> > written into CR3.  Then, the assembly code doesn't have to worry
> > about converting that value into a physical address and things work
> > regardless of whether or not CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY is set.
> > 
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> 
> Is similar patch needed for i386?

Yes, it is, in general, for i386 hibernation to work with ASLR.

But it doesn't work with it for other reasons ATM, AFAICS.

Unfortunately, I won't really have the time to take care of this any time
soon.

Thanks,
Rafael