linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] tools lib traceevent: Use USECS_PER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160805141942.07469948@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:19:42 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] tools lib traceevent: Use USECS_PER_SEC instead of
 hardcoded number

On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 09:20:04 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:

> Em Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 03:40:15PM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > 
> > Instead of using 1000000, define a USECS_PER_SEC macro and use that instead.  
> 
> Applying, but the kernel uses USEC_PER_SEC, NSEC_PER_SEC, etc, at some
> point I'll try and get those same headers in tools/include/ and make all
> of tools/ use the same convention as the kernel.

Was this ever applied? Anyway, I'll also go ahead and convert this to
the non plural versions to match the kernel.

-- Steve

> 
> - Arnaldo