[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160805200823.GB7999@amd>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:08:23 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Michael Ryleev <gmar@...gle.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] char: rpmb: provide a user space interface
On Mon 2016-07-18 23:27:49, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> The user space API is achieved via two synchronous IOCTL.
IOCTLs?
> Simplified one, RPMB_IOC_REQ_CMD, were read result cycles is performed
> by the framework on behalf the user and second, RPMB_IOC_SEQ_CMD where
> the whole RPMB sequence including RESULT_READ is supplied by the caller.
> The latter is intended for easier adjusting of the applications that
> use MMC_IOC_MULTI_CMD ioctl.
Why " "?
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
> +
> +static long rpmb_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return __rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, (void __user *)arg);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> +static long rpmb_compat_ioctl(struct file *fp, unsigned int cmd,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + return __rpmb_ioctl(fp, cmd, compat_ptr(arg));
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
Description of the ioctl is missing, and it should certainly be
designed in a way that it does not need compat support.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists