[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874m70qcq0.fsf@possimpible.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 10:30:15 +1000
From: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, wei.guo.simon@...il.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Simon Guo <wei.guo.simon@...il.com>,
Ulrich Weigand <ulrich.weigand@...ibm.com>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Rashmica Gupta <rashmicy@...il.com>,
Khem Raj <raj.khem@...il.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Suraj Jitindar Singh <sjitindarsingh@...il.com>,
Chris Smart <chris@...troguy.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/30] powerpc/ptrace: Adapt gpr32_get, gpr32_set functions for transaction
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:
>> Is there a nice simple fix we could deploy to squash this warning, or
>> will we just live with it?
>
> This series has been nothing but pain. Given we're already at v13, and people
> really want this support to go in, I'm going to leave it in the tree.
>
> Once it's in we can refactor the implementation, which is a bit of a mess, and
> hopefully in the process fix the warnings.
OK, I'll push this onto my stack to look at again in a couple of months.
Regards,
Daniel
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (860 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists